Our publication ethics and publication negligence statement is based on the Code of Conduct and Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors (Committee on Publication Ethics, 2011).

Publisher Responsibilities
Publication decisions:
The editor is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal will be published.
The editor will evaluate the manuscripts, regardless of authors' race, sexual orientation, gender, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship or political philosophy. The decision will be based on the Importance of work, originality and clarity, as well as the validity of the study and its relevance to science. The current legal requirements regarding defamation, copyright infringement and plagiarism are considered.

The publisher and any person on the editorial team do not disclose any information about a manuscript submitted for possible publication other than the corresponding author or reviewers.

Disclosure and conflicts of interest:
Unpublished information disclosed in a submitted paper will not be used by the publisher or members
The editorial board and the review team.

Any selected evaluator who feels disqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript, or knows
That its rapid revision will be impossible, it must notify the publisher and withdraw from the review.

All manuscripts received for review should be treated as confidential documents. Should not be
Disclosed or discussed with others except as authorized by the publisher.

Objectivity rules:
Reviews should be conducted objectively. The author's personal criticism is inappropriate. Evaluators
Should clearly and objectively express their views with supporting arguments.

Recognition of sources:
Evaluators should identify whether the papers cited are mentioned in the references section. They shall verify that observations or arguments derived from other publications are accompanied by their source. The evaluators shall notify any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript in question and any other published articles of which they are aware.

Disclosure and conflict of interest:
Information or ideas obtained through peer review should be kept confidential and not used
For personal advantage. Evaluators should not revise manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative or other relationships with any of the authors, companies or institutions associated with the work.

Duties of the authors:
Search Patterns:
Authors of original research should provide an accurate account of the work as well as an objective discussion of its meaning. The underlying data must be represented on paper. The manuscript should contain enough details and references to allow the search to be repeated. Fraudulent or intentionally inaccurate statements constitute unethical and unacceptable behavior.

Access and retention of data:
Authors may be asked to provide the raw data of their study and should be prepared to make the data publicly available, if possible. Authors should ensure the accessibility of such data to other relevant professionals for at least 10 years after publication (preferably through an institutional data repository) provided that the confidentiality of the participants can be protected and the legal rights to the data do not prevent their release.

Originality, plagiarism and sources:
Authors will only present entirely original works and will adequately cite the work and / or words of others. Publications that have influenced the nature of the work should also be cited.

Publication sliced, redundant or concurrent:
Papers that essentially describe the same research should not be published in more than one journal.
Submitting the same work to more than one journal constitutes unethical publication that is unacceptable behavior.

Journals and Advertising:
Manuscripts that have been published as copyrighted material elsewhere may not be submitted.
Manuscripts under review by the journal should not be retransmitted to another publication, since we have established the publication date and the author who does not agree with the deadline should not submit his work. If he changes his opinion, he should request the immediate cancellation of the evaluation.
By submitting a manuscript, the author (s) retain original material. In case of publication, they allow the use of their work under a CC-BY license [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/], which allows others to copy, distribute and transmit the work, as well as to adapt Work and make commercial use of it, always citing the original source.

Article Authorship:
Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the design, design, implementation or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made contributions should be listed as co-authors and should be prepared to present and defend the work in its entirety.
The corresponding author is committed to ensuring that all co-authors contribute. The corresponding author will also check that all co-authors have approved the final version of the document and agreed to its submission for publication.

Disclosure and conflicts of interest:
All authors should report any financial or other conflicts that may be interpreted to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be cited.

Errors in published work:
When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his own published work, it is his obligation to promptly notify the editor of the journal and to cooperate to correct

Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). (2011, March 7).
Code of Conduct and Best-Practice
Guidelines for Journal Editors. Retrieved from